Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 DECEMBER 2006

Follow The Local Rules -- Carefully!

In a second case in less than four weeks where a party literally lost its claim on a failure to adhere to a procedural order, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a grant of summary judgment of non-infringement based on a district court's insistence on adherence to the local patent rules (in this case, the Northern District of California) and refusal to permit the patent owner to modify its infringement contentions or supplement its expert report.

United StatesIntellectual Property

In a second case in less than four weeks where a party literally lost its claim on a failure to adhere to a procedural order, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a grant of summary judgment of non-infringement based on a district court's insistence on adherence to the local patent rules (in this case, the Northern District of California) and refusal to permit the patent owner to modify its infringement contentions or supplement its expert report. 02 Micro International Limited v. Monolithic Power Systems, Inc., Case No. 06-1064 (Fed Cir., Nov. 15, 2006) (Dyk, J.).

The Northern District of California has long since adopted local rules that require parties to state early in the litigation and with specificity their contentions with respect to infringement and invalidity. The ability of parties to amend those contentions is restricted. Apart from amendments designed to take account of the district court's claim construction, amendments are permitted only for "good

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from