Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 26 MAY 2022

Finguerra-DuCharme Discusses Trademark Genericness Standard

Pryor Cashman LLP
Pryor Cashman LLP
Contributor
Pryor Cashman LLP

Pryor Cashman LLP

Pryor Cashman is an award-winning midsize law firm headquartered in New York City. With over 200...

View firm profile
Explore more from Pryor Cashman LLP

Pryor Cashman Partner Dyan Finguerra-DuCharme, Co-Chair of the Trademark Group and a member of the Intellectual Property, Litigation, and Media + Entertainment Groups...

United StatesIntellectual Property

Pryor Cashman Partner Dyan Finguerra-DuCharme, Co-Chair of the Trademark Group and a member of the Intellectual Property, Litigation, and Media + Entertainment Groups, spoke with Law360 about updates to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office's approach to rejecting generic trademarks.

In "USPTO Update Brings Consistency To Genericness Standard," she evaluates the new standard:

"This is a long overdue housekeeping measure by the USPTO," said Dyan Finguerra-Ducharme of Pryor Cashman LLP. "It has made no sense that there was a difference in an evidentiary burden between examination and an inter partes proceeding."

Previously, a trademark applicant could appeal an examiner's refusal based on genericness at the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board for not meeting the clear evidence standard — only to have the board later find the mark to be generic under the lower standard of preponderance of the evidence, according to Finguerra-Ducharme.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from