Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 NOVEMBER 2014

Fee Shifting In Trade Secrets Cases

Butler Snow LLP
Butler Snow LLP
Contributor
Butler Snow LLP

Butler Snow LLP

Some law firms promise client service. Butler Snow delivers on that promise. Surveys by respected...

View firm profile
Explore more from Butler Snow LLP

So, what’s "bad faith" sufficient to trigger the fee shift?

United StatesIntellectual Property

A number of states, including Tennessee, have adopted the Uniform Trade Secrets Act ("UTSA"). A court may award attorney's fees, if:

  • A claim of misappropriation is made in bad faith;
  • A motion to terminate an injunction is made or resisted in bad faith, or
  • Willful and malicious misappropriation exists,

T.C.A. § 47-25-1705 (West 2014).

So, what's "bad faith" sufficient to trigger the fee shift?

"Bad faith" requires: (1) objective speciousness of the plaintiff's claim, and (2) subjective bad faith in bringing or maintaining the claim. Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc. v. Wesley Fin. Grp., LLC, 3:12-CV-559, 203 WL 785938 (M.D. Tenn. 2/28/13). "Plausibility" of the claim defeats the claim of bad faith for the shifting purposes. Dominion Enterprises v. Dataium, LLC, M2012-02385-COA-R3CV, 2013 WL 6858266 (Tenn. Ct. App. 12/27/13)

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from