Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 26 OCTOBER 2016

Federal Circuit Patent Updates - October 2016

WilmerHale
WilmerHale
Contributor
WilmerHale

WilmerHale

WilmerHale's London office was established more than 40 years ago. With lawyers qualified in the...

View firm profile
Explore more from WilmerHale

Dyk, J. Denying petition for rehearing and confirming the Court's earlier order. "The Board's vacatur of its institution decisions and termination of the proceedings constitute decisions whether to institute inter partes review and are therefore 'final and nonappealable' under § 314(d).

United StatesIntellectual Property

Medtronic, Inc. v. Robert Bosch Healthcare (No. 2015-1977, -1986, -1987, 10/20/16) (Lourie, Dyk, Hughes)

October 20, 2016 3:41 PM

Dyk, J. Denying petition for rehearing and confirming the Court's earlier order. "The Board's vacatur of its institution decisions and termination of the proceedings constitute decisions whether to institute inter partes review and are therefore 'final and nonappealable' under § 314(d). Nothing in Cuozzo is to the contrary." Defendant in litigation filed petitions for inter partes review and those petitions were denied. Defendant was subsequently acquired. Less than a year after litigation was initiated, the new corporate parent of the defendant filed additional petitions for inter partes review naming itself as the sole real party in interest and stating it had acquired defendant in the litigation. The Board granted institution of those petitions, but those institutions were subsequently vacated when the Board determined that the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from