Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 APRIL 2025

Federal Circuit: Machine Learning Patents Ineligible In Recentive Analytics, Inc. v. Fox Corp.

Greenberg Traurig
Greenberg Traurig
Contributor
Greenberg Traurig

Greenberg Traurig

Greenberg Traurig, LLP has approximately 3,200 lawyers across 51 locations in the United States,...

View firm profile
Explore more from Greenberg Traurig

In a precedential decision addressing the intersection of machine learning and patent law, the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Recentive Analytics, Inc.'s...

United StatesIntellectual Property
Go-To Guide:
  • The Federal Circuit ruled, in a case of first impression, that the machine learning patents at issue were ineligible under 35 U.S.C. § 101.
  • In its precedential decision, the court held that claims that merely apply "established methods of machine learning" to "new data environments" are ineligible for protection.
  • The court emphasized that iterative training and dynamic adjustments are inherent to the nature of machine learning and do not constitute an inventive concept.
  • The decision underscores the importance of disclosing specific implementations or improvements to machine learning processes in patent applications.

In a precedential decision addressing the intersection of machine learning and patent law, the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Recentive Analytics, Inc.'s patent infringement claims against Fox Corp. and its affiliates. The court held that Recentive's patents merely applied

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from