Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 OCTOBER 2017

Federal Circuit Avoids Addressing Joinder, Questions Expanded Panel Use

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board) decision finding claims invalid as obvious...

United StatesIntellectual Property

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board) decision finding claims invalid as obvious, but did not directly address the PTAB's determination that joinder was appropriate. Nidec Motor Corp. v. Zhongshan Broad Ocean Motor Co., Case No. 16-2321 (Fed. Cir., Aug. 22, 2017) (per curiam) (Dyk, J, concurring). In a concurrence, however, two members of the panel opined that the PTAB's use of expanded panels to reach a position consistent with other panels was objectionable.

Nidec owns a patent directed to a low-noise heating, ventilating and air conditioning (HVAC) system. Compared to conventional HVAC systems, the patented system has an improved motor controller that uses sinewave communications instead of conventional square-wave communications. The use of sinewave communications results in less vibration and noise from the motor, since sinewave communications have more gradual and continuous oscillations in

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from