Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 SEPTEMBER 2025

Federal Circuit's First Foray Into AIA-Derivation Proceedings

K&L Gates
K&L Gates
Contributor
K&L Gates

K&L Gates

The Firm K&L Gates is an integrated, international law firm. As a single global law firm, truly...

View firm profile
Explore more from K&L Gates

The Federal Circuit recently issued its first review of a derivation proceeding, a rarely used proceeding provided for by the America Invents Act (AIA).

United StatesIntellectual Property

The Federal Circuit recently issued its first review of a derivation proceeding, a rarely used proceeding provided for by the America Invents Act (AIA).

In this case, two entities, Global Health Solutions LLC (GHS) and Marc Selner, each filed patent applications for a method of preparing a wound treatment ointment. GHS alleged that Selner derived his patent application from Bradley Burnam, the inventor listed on GHS's application. The PTAB found that Mr. Selner independently conceived of the invention before Burnam communicated it to him.

The Federal Circuit's decision underscores the nuances of AIA derivation proceedings, which differ significantly from pre-AIA interference proceedings. Under the AIA, the focus is not on who was the first to invent but rather on whether the first filer derived the invention from another inventor. In this case, the court found that Selner had independently conceived the invention before any communication from Burnam, thus

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from