Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 APRIL 2016

Fed. Circ. Clarifies Scope Of IPR Petitioner

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Contributor
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP is one of the world’s largest firms focusing on...

View firm profile
Explore more from Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

In this article, the authors discuss how the Federal Circuit has provided some clarity on the merits of this PTAB practice and its effect on the estoppel provision.

United StatesIntellectual Property

In a previous article titled " Recent Decisions Shed Some Light on Scope of AIA Estoppel," Finnegan attorneys  Barbara C. McCurdy and  Arpita Bhattacharyya discussed how the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's (PTAB) practice of only addressing instituted claims in the final written decision was adding uncertainty to the scope of inter partes review estoppel under 35 U.S.C. § 315(e). In this article, the authors discuss how the Federal Circuit has provided some clarity on the merits of this PTAB practice and its effect on the estoppel provision.

Previously published by Law360

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from