Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 22 MAY 2014

Describing Algorithms In Understandable Terms That Provide Structure To A Person Of Ordinary Skill In The Art Renders Definite Computerized Means-Plus-Function Claims

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Contributor
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP is one of the world’s largest firms focusing on...

View firm profile
Explore more from Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

In "Chicago Board Options Exchange, Inc. v. International Securities Exchange, LLC", the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court’s judgment of noninfringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,618,707 by the Chicago Board Options Exchange, Inc.

United StatesIntellectual Property

In Chicago Board Options Exchange, Inc. v. International Securities Exchange, LLC, No. 13-1326 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 7, 2014), the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court's judgment of noninfringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,618,707 ("the '707 patent") by the Chicago Board Options Exchange, Inc. ("CBOE"), and reversed the district court's finding that claim 2 of the '707 patent was indefinite.

International Securities Exchange, LLC ("ISE") is the owner of the '707 patent, which is directed to an "automated exchange" for trading financial instruments, and which distinguishes the "automated" exchange from the traditional, floor-based "open-outcry" system for trading options contracts. ISE brought suit against CBOE for patent infringement based on CBOE's Hybrid Trading System, and CBOE subsequently brought suit against ISE seeking a DJ of noninfringement.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from