Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 NOVEMBER 2024

D. Mass. Patent Litigation Update: September 2024

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Contributor
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP is one of the world’s largest firms focusing on...

View firm profile
Explore more from Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

This is part of a series of articles discussing recent orders of interest issued in patent cases by the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts.

United StatesIntellectual Property

This is part of a series of articles discussing recent orders of interest issued in patent cases by the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts.

In JT IP Holding, LLC v. Florence, No. 20-cv-10433, Judge Talwani ruled on Defendants' motion to dismiss and, in the alternative, for summary judgment of all counts and cross motions for partial summary judgment as to validity of a patent assignment.

This case revolves around a business dispute related to a dry-well device developed and patented by an individual defendant and allegedly assigned to Plaintiff JT IP Holding. Plaintiffs originally asserted three federal claims, including patent infringement, and eight state law claims. By the time the present motions were filed, all federal claims had been dismissed and only state law claims remained.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from