Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 SEPTEMBER 2021

Carving Out A Patented Indication From A Generic-Pharmaceutical Label Will Not Always Avoid Infringement

The patentee sued the alleged infringer over a generic version of the pharmaceutical drug Coreg® (carvedilol). Coreg® was approved by the FDA for three indications...

United StatesIntellectual Property

The patentee sued the alleged infringer over a generic version of the pharmaceutical drug Coreg® (carvedilol). Coreg® was approved by the FDA for three indications: (i) hypertension, (ii) congestive heart failure ("CHF"), and (iii) post-myocardial infarction left ventricular dysfunction ("post-MI LVD"). From 2007 to 2011, the accused infringer deleted the indication for CHF from its FDA-approved label and included only the indications for hypertension and post-MI LVD. The question was whether the accused infringer's label nevertheless induced infringement of a patent over a method of decreasing mortality caused by congestive heart failure. After a jury verdict of infringement, the district court granted the accused infringer's renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law ("JMOL") of noninfringement, on the basis that the accused infringer's so-called "skinny" label did not cause or encourage the patented use. On appeal, the Federal Circuit vacated the grant of

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from