Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 29 FEBRUARY 2016

Can Disclaimer Be Used To Avoid PGR Institution?

Only patents subject to the first-inventor-to-file provisions of the AIA are eligible for post-grant review.

United StatesIntellectual Property

The PTAB recently instituted post-grant review in Core Survival, Inc. v. S & S Precision, LLC (PGR2015-00022, paper 8). While the patent owner did not argue that that the patent was eligible for post-grant review, the facts raise the question of whether disclaimer could be used by patent owners to avoid PGR institution.

Only patents subject to the first-inventor-to-file provisions of the AIA are eligible for post-grant review. See AIA § 6(f)(2)(A). The first-inventor-to-file provisions apply to any application for patent, and to any patent issuing thereon, that contains or contained at any time a claim to a claimed invention that has an effective filing date on or after March 16, 2013. See AIA § 3(n)(1). In this case, the patent at issue was filed after March 16, 2013, but was a continuation-in-part of an application filed before that date. The application was originally filed with a claim 22 that petitioner asserted related to new matter added in the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from