Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 JUNE 2015

An Abstract Idea By Any Other Name

In Epicor, petitioner filed a petition to institute a CBM review of a patent directed to protecting data against unauthorized access, asserting the subject matter was not patent eligible under § 101.

United StatesIntellectual Property

Epicor Software Corp. v. Protegrity Corp.; Google Inc. v. Unwired Planet, LLC

Addressing the issue of unpatentable subject matter in a post-Alice world, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) recently invalidated two patents under § 101 in separate covered business method (CBM) proceedings. Epicor Software Corp. v. Protegrity Corp., Case CBM2015-00006 (PTAB, Apr. 21, 2015) (Petravic, APJ); Google Inc. v. Unwired Planet, LLC, Case CBM2014-00004 (PTAB, Apr. 6, 2015) (Bisk, APJ).

In Epicor, petitioner filed a petition to institute a CBM review of a patent directed to protecting data against unauthorized access, asserting the subject matter was not patent eligible under § 101. Prior to analyzing the merits of the § 101 contentions, the PTAB addressed whether the patent was eligible for CBM review. A CBM patent claims "a financial product or service," and "does not include patents for technological inventions." The patent owner argued

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from