Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 JANUARY 2022

A Trademark May—or May Not—be Aesthetically Functional

Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, PC
Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, PC
Contributor
Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, PC

Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, PC

Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman (CLL) is recognized worldwide as a leading intellectual property law and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, PC

When one party's trademark is used ornamentally on another party's product, that use may be protected by the aesthetic functionality defense, or that use may be a trademark infringement.

United StatesIntellectual Property

When one party's trademark is used ornamentally on another party's product, that use may be protected by the aesthetic functionality defense, or that use may be a trademark infringement. But how do you know?

LTTB LLC owned four U.S. trademark and service mark registrations, two of which had become incontestable, of the pun LETTUCE TURNIP THE BEET for tote bags, t-shirts and other goods and services. It displayed this phrase across the front of the items, and also on hangtags or labels affixed to them. LTTB sued an Australian online retailer named Redbubble, Inc. for selling similar products displaying the same phrase. Redbubble's defense was that its use of this phrase was protected by the doctrine of aesthetic functionality.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from