Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 NOVEMBER 2017

A Rare Binding PTAB Decision: Guidance On Multiple Petitions

The recent decision in General Plastic Ind​ustrial Co. v. Canon Kabushiki Kaisha denying the petitioner's requests for a rehearing provided a "baseline" of factors to be considered ...

United StatesIntellectual Property

The recent decision in General Plastic Industrial Co. v. Canon Kabushiki Kaisha denying the petitioner's requests for a rehearing provided a "baseline" of factors to be considered as to the limited circumstances when second — or "follow-on" — petitions are likely to be successful in Patent Trial and Appeal Board trials.

A recent decision denying the petitioner's requests for a rehearing provided a "baseline" of factors to be considered as to the limited circumstances when second — or "follow-on" — petitions are likely to be successful in Patent Trial and Appeal Board trials.

The petitioner in General Plastic filed two inter partes review petitions, each challenging one patent. The PTAB denied institution on the merits. The petitioner then sought rehearing, which was denied. The petitioner filed further petitions several months later with newly discovered art, challenging the same two patents based in part on the new references.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from