Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 JUNE 2020

A Lawyer Walks Into A [Public Disclosure] Bar . . . .

Arnold & Porter
Arnold & Porter
Contributor
Arnold & Porter

Arnold & Porter

With over 1,000 lawyers across 16 offices worldwide, Arnold & Porter is renowned for its...

View firm profile
Explore more from Arnold & Porter

Earlier this month, in Silbershear v. Valeant, a federal judge denied a lawyer's attempt to act as a qui tam relator under the False Claims Act (FCA) based on information the lawyer uncovered...

United StatesIntellectual Property

Earlier this month, in Silbershear v. Valeant,1 a federal judge denied a lawyer's attempt to act as a qui tam relator under the False Claims Act (FCA) based on information the lawyer uncovered in past litigation.

Prior to bringing his qui tam suit, the lawyer represented a plaintiff drug company in challenging the validity of defendants' patent. During the course of that litigation, the lawyer discovered articles that were not previously disclosed to the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) during the defendants' initial patent application. The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) struck down the validity of defendants' patent, citing the articles as evidence that the patent relied on "obvious" information.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from