Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 OCTOBER 2015

3D Printing And Public Policy

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Contributor
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP is one of the world’s largest firms focusing on...

View firm profile
Explore more from Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

As industrial and personal 3D printers become capable of making more and more things, it will be more difficult to control products being made by 3D printing and related laws may become increasingly impotent.

United StatesIntellectual Property

As industrial and personal 3D printers become capable of making more and more things, it will be more difficult to control products being made by 3D printing and related laws may become increasingly impotent. For example, the Gartner group predicts that "by 2018, 3D printing will result in the loss of at least $100 billion per year in intellectual property globally." Similar predictions, which turned out to be accurate, were made about the music industry in the mid-to-late 1990s. Gartner's prediction seems to be based not only on IP infringement, but also on IP that will never be bought. 3D printing may result in widespread copying, not only of consumer products, but perhaps more importantly, B2B components. Companies that formerly bought replacement parts may start making the parts themselves, or repairing them. To date, little thought has been given to the effects of 3D printing on other areas of the law. In this article, Finnegan attorney  John F. Hornick discusses

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from