Addressing the propriety of the trial court's jury
instruction regarding willful infringement, the US Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit found that descriptors such as
"egregious behavior" and whether an infringer is
"worthy of punishment" are inappropriate for a jury
instruction on willful patent infringement, but ultimately found
that the instruction was not legally erroneous. Eko Brands, LLC
v. Adrian Rivera Maynez Enterprises, Inc., Case Nos.
2018-2215, 2018-2254 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 13, 2020) (Dyk, J.) (Reyna, J.
concurring-in-part, dissenting-in-part).
Eko Brands asserted a claim of patent infringement against
Adrian Rivera Maynez Enterprises (ARM). Based on the district
court's claim construction, ARM stipulated to infringement, and
the case went to trial on the issue of damages.
