Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 AUGUST 2020

Take Two: State AGs Target The FDIC's Final Rule Reaffirming Valid-When-Made Doctrine

Morrison Foerster
Morrison Foerster
Contributor
Morrison Foerster

Morrison Foerster

With approximately 1,000 lawyers in 19 offices, Morrison & Foerster is a preeminent global law firm...

View firm profile
Explore more from Morrison Foerster

Last week, the state attorneys general of seven states and the District of Columbia filed suit against the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) challenging the FDIC's final rule reaffirming...

United StatesInsurance

Last week, the state attorneys general of seven states and the District of Columbia filed suit against the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) challenging the FDIC's final rule reaffirming the valid-when-made doctrine for loans originated by state-chartered federally insured banks. The lawsuit was expected after three state attorneys general filed suit against the OCC challenging its final valid-when-made rule. (For analysis of the OCC challenge, see our Client Alert.)

The complaint challenging the FDIC's final rule repeats almost verbatim most of the allegations in the complaint challenging the OCC's final rule. As with the OCC's final rule, the state AGs seek to set aside the FDIC's final rule on both substantive and procedural grounds, including that:

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved

See more popular content from