Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 JANUARY 2022

Spotlight: Property Insurance Case To Watch

On December 21, 2021, the Florida Supreme Court accepted jurisdiction arising from State Farm Fla. Ins. Co. v. Parrish, 312 So. 3d 145, 151 (Fla. 2d DCA 2021), holding "[w]e certify conflict with Brickell...

United StatesInsurance
Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP
Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP
Author LinkedIn connections

(January 2022) - On December 21, 2021, the Florida Supreme Court accepted jurisdiction arising from State Farm Fla. Ins. Co. v. Parrish, 312 So. 3d 145, 151 (Fla. 2d DCA 2021), holding "[w]e certify conflict with Brickell, to the extent it holds that a public adjuster who has a contingency interest in an insured's appraisal award or represents an insured in an appraisal process can serve as a 'disinterested appraiser' under a policy's appraisal provision." With the court's acceptance of jurisdiction in Parrish, which is based upon the noted conflict with Brickell, and knowing that Brickell relied upon Rios v. Tri-State Insurance Company, 714 So. 2d 547 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998), it appears that the Parrish court will solidify the meaning of "disinterested," "independent" and "impartial" appraisers – and will not limit its ruling to just "disinterested" appraisers.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from