Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 28 JANUARY 2010

Revisiting Zubulake: Discovery Sanctions In The e-Discovery Context

On January 11, 2010, Judge Scheindlin, who authored the groundbreaking "Zubulake" opinions, issued a new opinion regarding sanctions in eDiscovery.

United StatesInsurance

On January 11, 2010, Judge Scheindlin, who authored the groundbreaking Zubulake opinions, issued a new opinion regarding sanctions in eDiscovery.1 Pension Comm. of the Univ. of Montreal Pension Plan v. Banc of Am. Scs., 2010 U.S. Dist. Lexis 1839 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 11, 2010), involved an action against defendants who were connected to a hedge fund that lost money. These defendants sought sanctions against the plaintiffs for their alleged failure to properly preserve and produce documents, including electronically-stored information, and for submitting false declarations relating to their collection and production efforts.

In an 87-page opinion, Judge Scheindlin addressed key issues, including the definition of negligence, gross negligence and willfulness in the discovery context, and what types of conduct constitute this type of behavior. Judge Scheindlin also reviewed the law governing the imposition of sanctions for failure to produce electronically-stored information.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from