Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 SEPTEMBER 2021

Petrilli v. Adirondack Ins. Exchange

This decision involves a first-party property insurance dispute in which plaintiff-insureds claimed their building sustained damage from a collapse that was covered under their policy.

United StatesInsurance

Petrilli v. Adirondack Ins. Exchange, 2018 WL 2322773 (N.Y.Sup.), 2018 N.Y. Slip Op. 30941(U) (NY Sup. Ct., Nassau Co., May 16, 2018)

This decision involves a first-party property insurance dispute in which plaintiff-insureds claimed their building sustained damage from a collapse that was covered under their policy.  The insurer, Adirondack, disagreed because its engineers found the loss was caused by an excluded peril.

The insureds sued Adirondack and its parent company, National General.  Aside from claiming that defendants breached the insurance contract, the insureds alleged fraud on the ground that Adirondack's engineer allegedly changed the cause of the loss in his report at the request of Adirondack, ostensibly a move that supported Adirondack's decision to disclaim coverage. The insureds also asserted causes of action for violations of NY General Business Law § 349 and NY Unfair Claims Settlement Act, as well as breach of the duty of good faith and fair

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from