Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 SEPTEMBER 2019

People Ex. Rel. Allstate Ins. Co. v. Suh

In People ex rel. Allstate Ins. Co. v. Suh, 37 Cal. App. 5th 253 (2019), the California Court of Appeal affirmed the verdict in favor of Allstate Insurance Company

United StatesInsurance

(September 2019) - In People ex rel. Allstate Ins. Co. v. Suh, 37 Cal. App. 5th 253 (2019), the California Court of Appeal affirmed the verdict in favor of Allstate Insurance Company, finding that the defendants Christine Suh and Christina Chang violated Penal Code section 550, committing insurance fraud by procuring policyholder benefits through sham law firms.

Christine Suh and her mother, Christina Chang, developed a scheme to fraudulently obtain insurance proceeds. The defendants operated eight sham law offices, paying individual attorneys $3,000 per month to use their names and state bar license numbers. The defendants procured Allstate insureds as their “clients,” filing 318 insurance claims on their behalf – without the knowledge or authorization of the attorneys whose names and bar numbers they were using – and diverting insurance proceeds they obtained for their own personal use. Allstate sued the defendants, alleging they had violated Penal Code section

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from