Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 MARCH 2022

Pennsylvania Finds Exception To Anti-Subrogation Rule

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court recently adopted the "no-coverage exception" in Arlet v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board. 2022 WL 529350 (Pa. 2022).

United StatesInsurance

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court recently adopted the "no-coverage exception" in Arlet v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board. 2022 WL 529350 (Pa. 2022). As most subrogation professionals are aware, the anti-subrogation rule prohibits insurers from subrogating against their own insureds. The Court in Arlet held that the rule does not apply where the insurer makes payments on a non-covered risk.

Robert Arlet, a shipbuilder employed by the Flagship Niagara League, slipped on an icy sidewalk at work and suffered injuries. Flagship's insurer, Acadia Insurance Company, paid benefits to Mr. Arlet for his injuries under a commercial hull policy. The policy afforded indemnity and protection coverage for "crew members."

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from