Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 15 MARCH 2017

Lessons In Administering A Master Service Agreement

Timely reporting would, perhaps, have established an exception to the exclusion.

United StatesInsurance

Is condensate a contaminant? When it spills and burns a worker, yes. In Hiland Partners v. National Union Fire Insurance Company the operator, an additional insured under a contractor's commercial general liability insurance policy, was deprived of coverage – and a duty of the insurer to defend. We'll get to the lessons.  But first, ...

The accident

Hiland owns a gas processing facility in North Dakota and had an MSA with Missouri Basin under which MB would provide services. MB procured the insurance policy and included Hiland as an additional insured. As always, the insurer had a duty to defend. There was an exclusion in the policy for bodily injury arising out of the discharge, release, etc. of pollutants, which were defined as any "solid, liquid, gaseous or thermal irritant or contaminant, including smoke, vapor, soot, fumes, acid, alkali, chemicals and waste".

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from