Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 15 MARCH 2016

Insurance Insight - Broad Duty To Defend Applied Despite Late Notice

In Boyle, a tire exploded inside a garage owned by C&N, severely injuring plaintiff.

United StatesInsurance

Even when an insurer receives very belated notice of a suit against its insured, it can face harsh consequences if it does not take action to provide a defense.

Despite a policy limit of only $50,000 and notice of suit received by the insurer only after an entry of default against the insured in the underlying tort action, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) recently upheld a $3,574,357 judgment against an insurer for breaching its duty to defend. 

In Boyle, a tire exploded inside a garage owned by C&N, severely injuring plaintiff. C&N notified its insurer of the accident, but did not notify the insurer when plaintiff later filed the lawsuit because C&N had ceased operations. Therefore, the insurer did not defend the underlying suit, the court entered a default, and awarded a $2.25 million judgment by default after a damages hearing. Prior to the hearing, plaintiff's lawyer sent notice to the insurer about the hearing, but the insurer did not intervene. 

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from