Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 OCTOBER 2011

Insurance Coverage vs. Indemnification Obligations

When calamity strikes, there may be a silver lining: the policyholder may benefit by having both nsurance coverage and a right of indemnification from a third party to deal with the loss (or liability).

United StatesInsurance

When calamity strikes, there may be a silver lining: the policyholder may benefit by having both insurance coverage and a right of indemnification from a third party to deal with the loss (or liability). This silver lining, however, may feel more like tin when the insurance company argues that its coverage obligations are actually "secondary" and that the indemnification must pay first before the primary coverage is triggered.

In effect, the insurer has converted its primary insurance coverage policy to an excess insurance policy. While this strategy may not always work, it can be devastating to the policyholder if it does, particularly if the indemnification is promised from a corporate affiliate rather than an unrelated third party.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from