Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 FEBRUARY 2015

Harmonizing Risk Transfer: Avoiding Pitfalls With Additional Insured Provisions

Insurance requirements in commercial agreements and corresponding additional insured provisions in insurance policies are important tools to manage and transfer risks.

United StatesInsurance

Insurance requirements in commercial agreements and corresponding additional insured provisions in insurance policies are important tools to manage and transfer risks. However, far too often those efforts are thwarted by inattention and, in some cases, sloppiness. As exemplified by the disastrous outcome for the contracting parties in Cincinnati Insurance Company v. Vita Food Products, Inc., No. 13 C 05181 (E.D. Ill. January 30, 2015), there are many pitfalls to successfully transfer risk and secure additional insured coverage. In Vita Foods, the insurer (Cincinnati) argued that its policy required Vita to have received a certificate of insurance prior to a loss because the contract between the parties (Vita and Painters) was oral. It is unsurprising that parties operating on the basis of an oral agreement failed to satisfy this condition. The court agreed with Cincinnati, finding that the failure to obtain the certificate prior to the loss was fatal to the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from