Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 FEBRUARY 2005

Eleventh Circuit Addresses Geographically Diverse Employment Classes

In <EM>Cooper v. Southern Georgia Power Co</EM>., 390 F.3d 695 (11th Cir. 2004), the Eleventh Circuit recently rejected certification of a geographically diverse employment class action, setting up a sharp dichotomy between the Eleventh Circuit and the Northern District of California and sending an encouraging message to large employers.

United StatesInsurance
In Cooper v. Southern Georgia Power Co., 390 F.3d 695 (11th Cir. 2004), the Eleventh Circuit recently rejected certification of a geographically diverse employment class action, setting up a sharp dichotomy between the Eleventh Circuit and the Northern District of California and sending an encouraging message to large employers.

In Dukes v. Wal-Mart, the Northern District of California certified a nationwide class of over 1.5 million current and former female employees of Wal-Mart, working in 3,400 stores spread across the United States. In Dukes, the court found that the failure to promote and unequal pay claims of that class satisfied the commonality and typicality requirements for certification under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(a). Additionally, the Northern District of California certified claims for injunctive relief, compensatory and punitive damages under F.R.C.P. ("FRCP") 23(b)(2), finding that the claims for equitable relief predominated over the claims for money

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from