Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 AUGUST 2020

Dog Chasing Cat Provokes Additional Insured/Vicious Propensities Imbroglio

Scenario: Dog chases a cat. Guest gets caught in cable securing the dog. Dog owner and guest are significant others

United StatesInsurance

Scenario: Dog chases a cat. Guest gets caught in cable securing the dog. Dog owner and guest are significant others. Accident occurs at their former abode where he (but not she) then resides. Victim asserts claim on homeowners' policy. Carrier disclaims. And (of course) litigation ensues.

Jo Ann Davis was injured on April 23, 2017 when visiting the house owned and occupied by Timothy Phillips at 11 East Avenue in Cortland. Davis fell after becoming entangled in the cable securing Phillips's dog (Sam) just as the canine began to chase a cat.

Travelers disclaimed coverage on the basis that Davis was a named insured on the homeowners' insurance policy. Davis sued Travelers for (1)  a declaratory judgment that she was not a named insured on the policy on the date of the incident and requiring Travelers and Bailey Place Insurance, Inc., the insurance agency through which the homeowners' policy was obtained, to provide coverage for her claims and (2) damages from

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from