Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 JANUARY 2015

Color Match Arrives (Again) In Minnesota

The Minnesota Supreme Court issued an opinion last month addressing, in living color, an insurer’s obligation to match replacement materials after homes suffered storm damage.

United StatesInsurance

The Minnesota Supreme Court issued an opinion last month addressing, in living color, an insurer's obligation to match replacement materials after homes suffered storm damage. The opinion in Cedar Bluff Townhome Condominium Association, Inc. v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company, --N.W.2d--, No. A13-0124, 2014 WL 7156914 (Minn. Dec. 17, 2014) stemmed from a hail storm in October 2011 that damaged buildings in the Cedar Bluff townhome neighborhood.

The roofs on all 20 of the buildings required replacement, and at least one siding panel on each building sustained damage from hail. At the time of the storm the siding was more than a decade old, and the color had faded. Replacement panels were available with the same specifications, but they were not available in the same color. The policy that Cedar Bluff had with American Family (Am Fam) required payment for "direct physical loss or damage" to covered property resulting from a covered cause of loss. Furthermore,

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from