Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 MARCH 2012

Climate Change and Insurance Cover

The case, now on appeal, is about the interpretation of a CGL policy when the insured is defending an emissions charge.

United StatesInsurance

AES Corporation v Steadfast Insurance Company

Insurers breathed a collective sigh in 2011 when the Supreme Court of Virginia ruled that Steadfast Insurance Company (Steadfast) had no liability under a commercial general liability (CGL) policy to cover its insured, AES Corporation (AES) which was defending a claim to do with its carbon emissions. The relief was short lived. AES has now appealed the decision and the matter is back before the courts.

By way of background, in February 2008 the Village of Kivalina, a native community in Alaska, brought a claim against various oil and energy companies, including AES, alleging that the companies had rendered the village uninhabitable through the emission of greenhouse gases. The Village's main argument was that these emissions caused the Kivalina coastline to be exposed to storm surges, resulting in erosion. Kivalina alleges that when AES intentionally emitted millions of tons of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from