Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 OCTOBER 2025

California Insurance Code Section 533 Bars Indemnity Coverage For Retaliation Suit Against County

In a win for Wiley's client, a California superior court, applying California law, held that California Insurance Code Section 533 ("Section 533") barred all indemnity coverage for a retaliation claim against a county and certain county employees.

United StatesInsurance

In a win for Wiley's client, a California superior court, applying California law, held that California Insurance Code Section 533 ("Section 533") barred all indemnity coverage for a retaliation claim against a county and certain county employees. San Bernardino Cnty. v. Everest Nat'l Ins. Co., No. 23STCV02336 (Cal. Super. Ct. Sept. 12, 2025). Although the court determined that part of the underlying settlement fell within an exception to Section 533, it declined to apply the larger settlement rule.

The insured California county became involved in a dispute over flood control casements on land owned by a local developer. The developer sued the county and became increasingly involved in local politics. The county settled the lawsuit with the developer after a divided vote by its Board of Supervisors. Following the settlement with the developer, the county began investigating the developer and his political activity. The county filed criminal charges against the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from