Last year, the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform
State Laws ("NCCUSL") rolled out one of its latest
projects, the Uniform Voidable Transactions Act
("UVTA").1 According to NCCUSL's
website,2 the model statute has already been enacted
in eight states, including California (where it takes effect on
January 1, 2016), and has been introduced in four others, including
Massachusetts.
The first thing to know about the UVTA is that it is the Uniform
Fraudulent Transfer Act ("UFTA")3 with a new
name and the legal equivalent of a fresh coat of paint. In a
lengthy article about the drafting of the model
statute4, the reporter for the NCCUSL
drafting committee, Professor Kenneth C. Kettering, describes the
model statute as "the UFTA, renamed and lightly amended."
As light as the amendments may be, however, Kettering notes that
they are "significant enough to warrant
attention"5—significant enough, at least,
to justify his publishing a 57-page law review article