Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 DECEMBER 2012

Trust Me - A Security Trustee’s Duties To Subordinated

Ropes & Gray LLP
Ropes & Gray LLP
Contributor
Ropes & Gray LLP

Ropes & Gray LLP

Ropes & Gray is one of the world’s most respected law firms, with offices in key business and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Ropes & Gray LLP

A recent High Court judgment has highlighted the importance for mezzanine creditors of including express and robust contractual protections when negotiating intercreditor agreements and provides a helpful summary of a trustee’s duties to mezzanine lenders when enforcing security.

United StatesInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring
Matthew Cox
Matthew Cox
Mike Goetz
Mike Goetz
Tania Bedi
Tania Bedi
Dan Martin
Dan Martin
Bevis Metcalfe
Bevis Metcalfe
Author LinkedIn connections

A recent High Court judgment has highlighted the importance for mezzanine creditors of including express and robust contractual protections when negotiating intercreditor agreements and provides a helpful summary of a trustee's duties to mezzanine lenders when enforcing security.

The recent judgment of Saltri III Ltd v MD Mezzanine S.A. Sicar & Ors1 relates to the 2010 non-consensual restructuring of the Stabilus Group. The judgment provides a helpful overview of the way fiduciary relationships operate in a secured financing and the effect of provisions allowing duties that would otherwise arise to be departed from by contract.

The Court considered:

  • The "purpose" of an intercreditor agreement.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from