Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 JULY 2014

SCOTUS: Inherited IRAs Not Exempt

The Supreme Court issued a unanimous ruling in Clark v. Rameker, holding that inherited IRAs do not qualify for the retirement funds exemption in 11 U.S.C. 522(b)(3)(C).

United StatesInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring
Stites & Harbison PLLC
Stites & Harbison PLLC
Author LinkedIn connections

Earlier this month, the Supreme Court issued a unanimous ruling in Clark v. Rameker, 573 U.S. __ (2014) (a .pdf of the opinion is located here) holding that inherited IRAs do not qualify for the retirement funds exemption in 11 U.S.C. 522(b)(3)(C).

Section 522(b)(3)(C) permits a debtor to exempt from property of the estate the following:

"retirement funds to the extent that those funds are in a fund or account that is exempt from taxation under section 401, 403, 408, 408A, 414, 457, or 501(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986."

An "inherited IRA" is a category of retirement account that is specified in 26 U.S.C. 408A(d)(3)(C)(ii), and which constitutes "a traditional or Rother IRA that has been inherited after its owner's death." See Clark at 2. If the account owner's spouse is the inheritee, he or she may elect to either roll the funds into his or her own IRA, or may keep the money in an "inherited IRA" subject to several rules and restrictions. If a

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from