Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 FEBRUARY 2023

Recent Developments In Bankruptcy Law, January 2023

Jenner & Block LLP
Jenner & Block LLP
Contributor
Jenner & Block LLP

Jenner & Block LLP

Jenner & Block’s London office has built a powerful reputation for representing clients in their...

View firm profile
Explore more from Jenner & Block LLP

Court declines to enjoin third party claims against the debtor's jointly liable parent corporation. The debtor manufactured earplugs for many years. A major multinational corporation acquired it.

United StatesInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring

1. AUTOMATIC STAY

1.1 Covered Activities

1.1.a Court declines to enjoin third party claims against the debtor's jointly liable parent corporation. The debtor manufactured earplugs for many years. A major multinational corporation acquired it. Two years later, it transferred its earplug manufacturing operation to its parent. Although the parent continued to manufacture and sell the earplugs, 80% of the sales occurred before the transfer. The earplugs were ineffective, resulting in hundreds of thousands of product liability actions against the debtor and the parent in both state and federal court, with the federal actions consolidated under an MDL procedure. The debtor and the parent entered into a funding agreement, which provided that the parent would fund up to $1 billion to a plaintiffs' recovery trust and up to $240 million for the debtor's chapter 11 fees and expenses, and the debtor would indemnify the parent for any claims against the parent but could draw

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from