Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 NOVEMBER 2011

Picard Cannot Make It So: Madoff Trustee’s Recoveries Curtailed Again

Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
Contributor
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

Mintz is a litigation powerhouse and business accelerator serving leaders in life sciences, private...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

Recent decisions reinforce an earlier ruling that denied attempts by the Madoff Trustee, Irving H. Picard, to recover funds for the Ponzi scheme’s victims.

United StatesInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring

In a client advisory sent by our office a few months ago, we described a decision in the Madoff saga in which the District Court for the Southern District of New York (the Court) closed off a potential avenue of significant recovery for the Madoff Trustee (the Trustee) and the Ponzi scheme victims by denying the Trustee standing to pursue certain claims against feeder funds – firms that sent investors' funds to Madoff and that failed to detect the fraud. Now, not only has another judge reinforced that decision (see Picard v. JP Morgan Chase and UBS AG, et al., Decision and Order Granting Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Certain Common Law Claims, No. 11-civ-913, Docket #70 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 31, 2011)) by holding that the Trustee does not have standing to sue the big bank defendants for amounts in excess of $20 billion, but in another decision, the Court has once again curtailed the possible recovery by the Trustee, thus once more holding steadfastly to the law rather than

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from