Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 31 MARCH 2014

Minimizing Preference Exposure (Part II) – Contemporaneous Exchanges

In this prior post, a discussion was provided in connection with requiring a company to prepay for its goods or services in order to limit potential preferential exposure.

United StatesInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring

In this prior post, a discussion was provided in connection with requiring a company to prepay for its goods or services in order to limit potential preferential exposure.  If a company heading into bankruptcy cannot prepay for its goods or services, however, another measure which can be taken by vendors to minimize their preferential exposure is to require that payment be made "substantially contemporaneous" with the goods or services provided to the company.

Under Section 547(c)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code, a debtor or trustee may not avoid and recover transfers that are (a) intended by the debtor and defendant to be a contemporaneous exchange for new value given to the debtor, and (b) are in fact a substantially contemporaneous exchange.  What this means is that even if a payment made by a debtor during the 90 day Preference Period is not a prepayment, a creditor can defend itself from liability for such transfer if the parties intended for the debtor's payment,

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from