Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 NOVEMBER 2015

In re Travers

The bankruptcy court rejects the creditor's argument that its wholly underwater lien on the Chapter 13 debtors' residence cannot be avoided based on § 1322(b)(2).

United StatesInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring

Source: https://mattlindblom.wordpress.com/2015/11/23/in-re-travers/

(Bankr. E.D. Ky. Nov. 18, 2015)

The bankruptcy court rejects the creditor's argument that its wholly underwater lien on the Chapter 13 debtors' residence cannot be avoided based on § 1322(b)(2). The creditor argued that the Supreme Court's recent decision in Bank of America, N.A. v. Caulkett mandates that result, despite the fact that prior Sixth Circuit precedent makes clear that a Chapter 13 debtor may strip off such a lien. The court holds that Caulkett does not apply and it is required to comply with the prior Sixth Circuit precedent because it has not been overruled. Opinion below.

2015-11-16 – in re travers

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from