Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 19 NOVEMBER 2013

Fraudulent Transfers: More Or Less Insolvent

A chapter 11 liquidating trustee brought several proceedings to recover fraudulent transfers under both the Bankruptcy Code and a state version of the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act.

United StatesInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring

Richardson v. Checker Acquisition Corp. (In re Checker Motors Corp.), 495 B.R. 355 (Bankr. W.D. Mich. 2013) –

A chapter 11 liquidating trustee brought several proceedings to recover fraudulent transfers under both the Bankruptcy Code and a state version of the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act. The question for the court was whether the debtor's estimated liability for withdrawal from a multiemployer benefit plan should be included in determining the debtor's insolvency to support a constructive fraudulent transfer claim.

There are two avenues for asserting fraudulent transfer claims in a bankruptcy:  (1) a claim under Section 548 (the fraudulent transfer section of the Bankruptcy Code), and (2) a claim under state fraudulent transfer law using "strong arm" powers under Section 544 (which, among other things, allows avoidance of a transfer that is voidable by a hypothetical judicial lien or execution creditor).

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from