Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 MARCH 2010

Enforcement Update: FDIC Loses A Round

Fried Frank Harris Shriver & Jacobson
Explore more from Fried Frank Harris Shriver & Jacobson

In a recent battle with its regulator, Advanta Bank (Bank), a bank subsidiary of Advanta Corp. (Advanta) that is regulated by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), won a victory over the agency, when a U.S. District Court ruled that the FDIC did not have the authority to issue a temporary cease and desist order (C&D) against the Bank.

United StatesInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring
Thomas Vartanian
Thomas Vartanian
David Ansell
David Ansell
Robert Ledig
Robert Ledig
Gordon Miller
Gordon Miller

In a recent battle with its regulator, Advanta Bank (Bank), a bank subsidiary of Advanta Corp. (Advanta) that is regulated by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), won a victory over the agency, when a U.S. District Court ruled that the FDIC did not have the authority to issue a temporary cease and desist order (C&D) against the Bank. Temporary C&Ds are rarely issued by banking regulators because, among other things, they impose a heavy burden of proof on the agency due to the C&D restrictions being immediately effective unless a federal court sets the order aside. At a time when there is a strong inclination for courts to defer to regulatory judgment, the court's skepticism of the agency's position is noteworthy.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from