Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 JUNE 2017

Bankruptcy Group Explores Fee Defense Litigation Post-Asarco

Pryor Cashman LLP
Pryor Cashman LLP
Contributor
Pryor Cashman LLP

Pryor Cashman LLP

Pryor Cashman is an award-winning midsize law firm headquartered in New York City. With over 200...

View firm profile
Explore more from Pryor Cashman LLP

Under the American Rule, each party to a litigation is responsible for paying its own attorney fees, unless a statute or contract provides otherwise.

United StatesInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring

Under the American Rule, each party to a litigation is responsible for paying its own attorney fees, unless a statute or contract provides otherwise. Though this tenet is widely accepted, and seemingly straightforward, the application of statutory or contractual exceptions is not always clear cut.

In a recent article for The New York Law Journal, Partners Seth Lieberman, Patrick Sibley and Associate Matthew Silverman of Pryor Cashman's Bankruptcy, Reorganization + Creditors' Rights Group examined the bankruptcy bar's interpretation of parties' rights to recover attorney fees in the aftermath of the seminal U.S. Supreme Court decision, Baker Botts v. Asarco (2015). 

Asarco and its Impact on Fee Defense Litigation

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from