Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 MARCH 2016

A Third Party Release In A Confirmed Plan Shields Against Unknown And Nonexistent Claims

Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP
Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP
Contributor
Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP

Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP

In an increasingly global and interconnected world, Hughes Hubbard sets itself apart as a robust...

View firm profile
Explore more from Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP

Bankruptcy law and business expectations converged in the Residential Capital proceeding when the Bankruptcy Court confirmed that the third party release contained in ResCap's plan...

United StatesInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring

Bankruptcy law and business expectations converged in the Residential Capital ("ResCap") proceeding when the Bankruptcy Court confirmed that the third party release contained in ResCap's plan of reorganization protected ResCap's non-debtor parent from claims that were not known and did not exist at the time the plan was confirmed. The Bankruptcy Court reasoned that Section 502(h) of the Bankruptcy Code permitted the third party release to shield the parent even though the claim was contingent on the outcome of an adversary proceeding filed after the plan's confirmation. This aligned with the business expectation of the plan's financial sponsor, Ally Financial Inc. ("AFI"), the non-debtor parent that had contributed $2.1 billion to the reorganizing debtor to facilitate confirmation.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from