Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 29 SEPTEMBER 2010

Ninth Circuit Weakens Rule 9(b) In False Claims Act Litigation

Sheppard
Sheppard
Contributor
Sheppard

Sheppard

Businesses turn to Sheppard to deliver sophisticated counsel to help clients move ahead. With more...

View firm profile
Explore more from Sheppard

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently weakened the impact of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 9(b) in False Claims Act ("FCA") cases.

United StatesGovernment, Public Sector

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently weakened the impact of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 9(b) in False Claims Act ("FCA") cases. The FCA allows whistleblowers (called "relators") to bring lawsuits against contractors on behalf of the federal government. Relators can receive up to 30 percent of the government's ultimate recovery. This bounty incentivizes relators to bring FCA lawsuits. It also causes some relators to see the FCA as a retirement-advancing lottery, and their complaints often characterize innocent business challenges as fraudulent schemes.

Contractors attempt to eliminate these meritless suits by arguing that the complaints lack sufficient detail. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 9(b), FCA complaints must "state with particularity the circumstances constituting fraud." In fraudulent scheme complaints, the relators recite the proverbial "parade of horribles," overemphasizing perceived inadequacies in billing practices, quality

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from