In Short
The Situation: Challenges to the scope of
an agency's corrective action are notoriously hard to win at
the U.S. Government Accountability Office ("GAO") because
of the high level of deference normally afforded to agencies in
crafting corrective action. However, in a recent decision, GAO
sustained a bid protest challenging an agency's corrective
action, finding that the scope was "unreasonably
limited."
The Result: GAO found that the scope of
the corrective action was too narrow. The agency allowed proposal
revisions to only a limited portion of offerors' proposals, but
the solicitation required that proposal sections be consistent with
each other. Because changes to one section of the proposal would
materially impact other aspects of the proposals that offerors were
not permitted to change, GAO found the limitation to be
unreasonable.