Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 APRIL 2018

Malpractice By A Computerized Decision-Support Tool?

Mrs. Skounakis died of a coronary artery occlusion after being prescribed an unusual combination of drugs (phendimetrazine and liothyronine) by Dr. Sotillo for weight loss.

United StatesFood, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences

Charles A Weiss is a partner in Holland & Knight's New York office

Mrs. Skounakis died of a coronary artery occlusion after being prescribed an unusual combination of drugs (phendimetrazine and liothyronine) by Dr. Sotillo for weight loss. Her husband sued Dr. Sotillo for malpractice. What makes this case interesting to those other than the parties is the claim Mrs. Skounakis' husband also brought against Dr. G's Franchising Companies LLC ("Dr. G"), which provided Dr. Sotillo with a proprietary software package that was said to have endorsed the combination of drugs alleged to have caused Mrs. Skounakis' death.

The case was filed in the Superior Court of New Jersey, which held that the plaintiffs' expert witness was not qualified to render his opinions and accordingly granted summary judgment in favor of both Dr. G and Dr. Sotillo. In March 2018, the Appellate Division reversed, holding that the trial court erred in excluding the plaintiffs' expert and hence

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from