Log in or register
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 APRIL 2025

APHIS Evaluates Petitions Reviewed Under 2012 Process, Will Use Process Consistent With USDA Biotechnology Regulations Going Forward

Bergeson & Campbell
Explore more from Bergeson & Campbell

The U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) announced on March 27, 2025, that it will no longer use the process...

United StatesFood, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
Lynn L. Bergeson Esq.
Lynn L. Bergeson Esq.
Carla Hutton
Carla Hutton
Author LinkedIn connections

The U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) announced on March 27, 2025, that it will no longer use the process it outlined in 2012 for reviewing petitions seeking a determination that a modified plant should not be subject to the regulations for the introduction of organisms altered or produced through genetic engineering (modified organisms) that are plant pests or that there is reason to believe are plant pests. On March 6, 2012, APHIS announced that it would publish two separate Federal Register notices for petitions for which it prepares an environmental assessment. 77 Fed. Reg. 13258. The first notice would announce the availability of the petition, and the second notice would announce the availability of APHIS' decision-making documents, providing two opportunities for public comment. According to APHIS' March 2025 announcement, at the time, APHIS anticipated that enabling earlier public engagement on the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

View source

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

Peptides At A Crossroads: What Wellness Providers Need To Know About HHS And FDA Actions

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and FDA have submitted an interim access policy for peptide compounding to regulatory review, but no peptides have yet been added to the official list allowing pharmacies to compound them. While advisory committee votes in July 2026 recommended six peptides for inclusion, formal rulemaking has not begun, and any near-term access would likely come through temporary enforcement discretion rather than full approval.
United StatesFood, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
Holland & Knight
Holland & Knight
Article

Federal Regulators And State Boards Crack Down On RUO Peptides

The FDA has escalated enforcement against online peptide sellers through warning letters and criminal prosecution, while state medical boards impose stricter standards on prescribers. Recent actions reveal how research-use-only disclaimers fail when evidence shows intended human use, and one case resulted in a 70-month prison sentence combined with $5 million forfeiture.
United StatesFood, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
McDermott Will & Schulte
McDermott Will & Schulte
Article

Proposed AI Governance Framework: Risk-Mitigation Recommendations For Health Plans

Senator Maria Cantwell has proposed a comprehensive AI governance framework that could fundamentally reshape how health insurance plans deploy artificial intelligence in prior authorization and utilization management. With explicit focus on CMS's WISeR model and requirements for meaningful human oversight, the framework signals potential federal mandates that would require health plans to audit AI systems, ensure transparency in consequential decisions, and maintain accountability for AI-related harms.
United StatesFood, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
Crowell & Moring LLP
Crowell & Moring LLP
Article

FDA Balances Peptide Policy With Enforcement Against Unlawful Peptide Sellers

Over the past year, industry has had a front row seat as the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA” or the “Agency”) decides just how much leeway it wants to afford the manufacture, marketing, and sale of peptide products, and just where it wants to draw the line. Despite the recent decision of FDA’s Pharmacy Compounding Advisory Committee (“PCAC”) to recommend a number of peptides for inclusion on the 503A bulks list process — a move that represents a potentially more permissive stance toward peptide regulation, at least in terms of what can and cannot be compounded under 503A...
United StatesFood, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
Sheppard
Sheppard
Article

Root Causes Updates And Insights On Quality And Inspections

This issue covers U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), and U.S. Health and Human Services (HHS) developments spanning inspections, enforcement, transparency, and emerging product categories. FDA’s drug center and inspections office have updated their framework for coordinating facility evaluations and inspections (ConOps 2.0), and FDA has changed how it processes post-approval facility withdrawals for New Drug Applications (NDAs) and Abbreviated New Drug Applications (ANDAs).
United StatesFood, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
Arnold & Porter
Arnold & Porter
Article

Pharmaceutical Policy In Motion Continued: The Trump Administration’s Second Wave Of Drug Pricing Deals

The Trump administration's most-favored-nation pricing initiative has expanded to include nine additional mid-sized pharmaceutical manufacturers, bringing the total coverage to 89% of the brand drug market. These new agreements focus on Medicaid pricing discounts aligned with international rates, while manufacturers commit billions to U.S. manufacturing and research in exchange for exemptions from future pricing mandates and potential tariffs.
United StatesFood, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.