Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 15 SEPTEMBER 2004

When "Gross" is Really Not "Gross" And Other Anomalies

Jones Day
Jones Day
Contributor
Jones Day

Jones Day

Jones Day is a global law firm with more than 2,400 lawyers in 40 offices across five continents....

View firm profile
Explore more from Jones Day

In <I>General Motors Corp. v. Franchise Tax Board</I>, Case No. B165665 (June 30, 2004), the California Court of Appeals held that the Franchise Tax Board ("FTB") properly excluded returns of principal from certain sales of securities.

United StatesFinance and Banking

In General Motors Corp. v. Franchise Tax Board, Case No. B165665 (June 30, 2004), the California Court of Appeals held that the Franchise Tax Board ("FTB") properly excluded returns of principal from certain sales of securities.

General Motors ("GM"), a Delaware corporation, maintains a "Treasury Department" in New York City. The Treasury Department manages the excess cash of GM and its various related corporate entities and subsidiaries in the United States. During the years at issue, GM’s net corporate income totaled over $7 billion, of which the Treasury Department generated over a half billion dollars in income. Specifically, the Treasury Department used its excess cash to purchase various marketable securities such as U.S. Treasury bonds, notes and bills, as well as bank certificates of deposit (CDs), etc. The investments were categorized as follows: (1) direct sales1, (2) maturities, and (3) repurchase agreements2. Approximately 90% of the Treasury Department’s proceeds from

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from