Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 JULY 2015

Third Circuit Clarifies FDCPA Restrictions On Third-Party Communications

Under the FDCPA, a debt collector is liable to a consumer for contacting third parties in pursuit of that consumer's debt unless the communication falls under a statutory exception.

United StatesFinance and Banking

Action Item: Lenders and servicers should continue to maintain policies and procedures that minimize third-party communications and ensure maintenance of sufficient records documenting the frequency and purpose of those communications.

In Evankavitch v. Green Tree Servicing, LLC, the Third Circuit considered, as a matter of first impression, which party bears the burden with respect to alleged improper third-party communications under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692, et seq. ("FDCPA"). Evankavitch v. Green Tree Servicing, LLC, ---F.3d---, 2015 WL 4174441, at *1 (3d Cir. Jul. 13, 2015). Put differently, the court was asked to determine whether the debt collector must prove that allegedly improper third-party communications fall within § 1692b's exception, or whether it is incumbent on the debtor to disprove the applicability of that exception as an element of his claim. Id.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from